🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided view of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" agendas represent an existential risk to the continent's identity. However, this argument is based on a serious misreading of the situation. The true danger facing the EU is not societal but technological and economic lag.

A Glaring Growth Divide Separating Europe and the US

The data reveal a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the EU. Over this period, EU GDP per capita fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly 50% of the world’s 50 largest tech companies are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Problem

This widening economic gap stems from superior productivity growth in the US, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech leadership is decidedly American. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity raises a pressing issue: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is the EU stand? Experts widely concede it is essentially a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several key reasons account for this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a far deeper and agile system for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which limits the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hinder Europe. A US startup can introduce a product under a single regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is split among twenty-seven separate systems, creating significant internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically met with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have begun to propose serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of sweeping changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, these assets might enable much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses considerable advantages: high-quality workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and world-class labs. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these foundations could unleash a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not take the lead in developing next-generation tech, it can still dramatically increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.